Kludex Starlette: attackers can get in without a password
OFFICIAL NAME: Kludex Starlette HTTP Request/Response Smuggling Vulnerability
WHAT IT IS · WEBSITE OR ONLINE STOREIt runs public websites, online stores or the software behind them.
DO THIS FIRSTAsk whoever runs your website or store to update it. Not sure if you use it? Send this page to your IT provider or security lead and ask.
TECHNICAL SUMMARY Kludex Starlette contains a HTTP request/response smuggling vulnerability that could allow attackers to inject paths into the host part, prepending the actual path leading to issues such as authentication bypass when the authentication depends on the reconstructed URL’s path. This vulnerability could be chaned with CVE-2026-42271.
WHY THIS VERDICT Attacks are confirmed. The vulnerability is 159 days old, so current versions are being attacked. Ready-made attack tools are public. The exploit prediction score is 70%.
- HIGHEST CONFIRMED RUNG
- EXPLOITED
- CISA KEV
- LISTED
- EXPLOIT CODE
- READY TO USE
How far has it climbed?
01 TALK
□ NO EVIDENCE YETNEWEST EVIDENCE NONE YETNo evidence yet.
SRC: NONE YET02 EXPOSED
□ NOT TRACKED YETNO SOURCE FOR THIS STEP YETWe have no source that counts exposed systems yet. Internet scan data needs a partnership we do not have. No evidence here does not mean nothing is exposed.
03 TRIED
■ CONFIRMEDNEWEST EVIDENCE · 2 INDEPENDENT SOURCESAttacks that worked are confirmed (step 4), so attempts count as confirmed too.
04 EXPLOITED
■ CONFIRMEDNEWEST EVIDENCE · 2 INDEPENDENT SOURCESKludex Starlette contains a HTTP request/response smuggling vulnerability that could allow attackers to inject paths into the host part, prepending the actual path leading to issues such as authentication bypass when the authentication depends on the reconstructed URL’s path. This vulnerability could be chaned with CVE-2026-42271. CISA Vulnrichment marks CVE-2026-48710 as actively exploited.
05 DAMAGE
□ NOT TRACKED YETNO SOURCE FOR THIS STEP YETBreach notices and filings rarely name the flaw that was used, so we cannot link them to this event yet. No evidence here does not mean no harm.
When each thing happened
- DISCLOSED
- EXPLOIT CODE PUBLICDATE UNKNOWN
- FIRST ATTACK REPORT
- CISA KEV LISTING
- US FEDERAL DEADLINE
THE FIX
CISA's instruction: apply the vendor's fix, or stop using the product if no fix exists. The deadline CISA set for US federal agencies, Sep 16, 2026, has passed. It is a US government deadline; use it as a guide.
Questions to ask this week
- Do we run Kludex Starlette? If yes, is it patched or cut off from the internet?
- Who owns fixing it, and by what date?
- Have we checked for signs of attack since the first report, not just since the patch?
How it unfolded
- MAR 31, 20265 public GitHub repositories claim a proof of concept for CVE-2026-48710
- Attack activity. MAY 26, 2026CISA Vulnrichment marks CVE-2026-48710 as actively exploited
- Attack activity. SEP 1, 2026Kludex Starlette HTTP Request/Response Smuggling Vulnerability
SOURCES
- [1] nuclei-templates: Nuclei scan template: Starlette - Improper Validation of Unsafe Equivalence in Input, OCT 24
- [2] CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities: Kludex Starlette HTTP Request/Response Smuggling Vulnerability, SEP 1
- [3] CVE List V5 and CISA Vulnrichment: CISA Vulnrichment marks CVE-2026-48710 as actively exploited, MAY 26
- [4] PoC-in-GitHub: 5 public GitHub repositories claim a proof of concept for CVE-2026-48710, MAR 31