GitLab: attackers can run their own code
OFFICIAL NAME: Integer Overflow or Wraparound in GitLab
WHAT IT IS · DEVELOPER TOOLSIt holds source code and the keys used to build and ship software.
DO THIS FIRSTPatch it. If it faced the internet, change the keys and passwords stored in it. Not sure if you use it? Send this page to your IT provider or security lead and ask.
TECHNICAL SUMMARY An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 7.0 before 18.11.13, 19.0 before 19.0.10, 19.1 before 19.1.9, 19.2 before 19.2.9, 19.3 before 19.3.6, 19.4 before 19.4.3, and 19.5 before 19.5.1 that, under certain conditions, could have allowed an unauthenticated user to execute arbitrary code on the GitLab server due to integer overflow when compiling a specially crafted…
WHY THIS VERDICT One source reports attacks and the vulnerability is 20 days old. In our backtest a single early report was confirmed within 30 days about one time in twenty, so we wait for a second report or for attack attempts to be seen.
WHY IT RANKS HERE Exploitation is reported. The first report is 9 days old.
- HIGHEST CONFIRMED RUNG
- TALK
- CISA KEV
- NOT YET
- EXPLOIT CODE
- PROOF OF CONCEPT CLAIMED
How far has it climbed?
01 TALK
■ CONFIRMEDNEWEST EVIDENCE · 2 INDEPENDENT SOURCESCVE-2026-110264 discussed publicly (CIRCL sighting). Max-severity GitLab bug allows remote code execution over 12 years of releases.
02 EXPOSED
□ NOT TRACKED YETNO SOURCE FOR THIS STEP YETWe have no source that counts exposed systems yet. Internet scan data needs a partnership we do not have. No evidence here does not mean nothing is exposed.
03 TRIED
▨ REPORTED, NOT CONFIRMEDNEWEST EVIDENCE · 1 SOURCEAttacks that worked are reported (step 4), so attempts count as reported too.
04 EXPLOITED
▨ REPORTED, NOT CONFIRMEDNEWEST EVIDENCE · 1 SOURCEExploitation of CVE-2026-110264 reported (CIRCL sighting).
05 DAMAGE
□ NOT TRACKED YETNO SOURCE FOR THIS STEP YETBreach notices and filings rarely name the flaw that was used, so we cannot link them to this event yet. No evidence here does not mean no harm.
When each thing happened
- DISCLOSED
- EXPLOIT CODE PUBLICCLAIMED
- FIRST ATTACK REPORT
- CISA KEV LISTINGNOT YET
- US FEDERAL DEADLINENOT YET
Questions to ask this week
- Do we run GitLab? If yes, is it patched or cut off from the internet?
- Who owns fixing it, and by what date?
- Have we checked for signs of attack since the first report, not just since the patch?
How it unfolded
- OCT 22, 202611 public GitHub repositories claim a proof of concept for CVE-2026-110264
- OCT 22, 2026Max-severity GitLab bug allows remote code execution over 12 years of releases
- Attack activity. NOV 2, 2026Exploitation of CVE-2026-110264 reported (CIRCL sighting)
- NOV 5, 2026CVE-2026-110264 discussed publicly (CIRCL sighting)
SOURCES
- [1] CIRCL Vulnerability-Lookup sightings: CVE-2026-110264 discussed publicly (CIRCL sighting), NOV 5
- [2] CIRCL Vulnerability-Lookup sightings: Exploitation of CVE-2026-110264 reported (CIRCL sighting), NOV 2
- [3] The Register (security): Max-severity GitLab bug allows remote code execution over 12 years of releases, OCT 22
- [4] PoC-in-GitHub: 11 public GitHub repositories claim a proof of concept for CVE-2026-110264, OCT 22